Review: The Adventures of Tintin

Chick 1 says:

It’s taken me a month to get the theater to check out  the first of two  movies Mr. Spielberg has out right now. Despite the credits reading like a who’s who of my favorite storytellers (Peter Jackson, Steven Moffat, Edgar Wright), I was only somewhat interested in the story but very interested in the animation. 

The Basics: Based on a Belgian comic book series popular during the 1930′s, the story follows the  many adventures of its title character, Tintin (that’s pretty much what it says) an intrepid young reporter. 

What I Liked:  The animation did not disappoint.  The very first frame looked so photo-real that for a split second, I thought maybe there was short before the feature.  CG animation has come a long way in the last decade or so.  I remember being fascinated by Sully’s fur in Monsters Inc.  But getting skin tone and texture has still been lagging and human characters often seem dead-eyed.  Well, not anymore.  Despite these characters looking like the cartoons they were based on, they are amazingly real; Tintin and Captain Haddock especially.  Tintin, played by Jamie Bell,  is a really amazing performance.  Some of his movements and emotions are so subtle; it’s really astounding.  And Captain Haddock, played by King of All Motion Capture Andy Serkis, completely reminds me of Tommy Lee Jones. 

It’s easy to see how this story captured Spielberg’s love of 30s and 40s serials.  It has the same sort of innocent adventurous feel as Raiders of the Lost Ark.  And it’s great to see what Spielberg does with a camera when there are no physical obstacles.  Some of the shots during the action sequences are dizzying!

What I Didn’t Like:  You can tell that the filmmakers were trying to capture the spirit of a 1930′s comic while trying to update some aspects, but not everything translates to the modern world.  The bumbling twin-like detectives, played by Brilliant Comic Bromancers Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, just come across as silly.  And there are more than a few extremely convenient plot contrivances.  Several times I found myself thinking, “Really, it’s that easy?”

Bottom Line:  Not completely up to standards for the filmmaking gods behind it but still very much worth a trip to the theater (and worth the 3D glasses – I don’t often say that).  Give your child-like spirit a night at the movies!

Posted on by Chick 1 in Reviews, The 2010s 499 Comments

499 Responses to Review: The Adventures of Tintin

  1. vuxxcray
  2. lwfsxjtj
  3. XdeAardjabgt

    Ich empfehle jedem eine sehr gute Website n1 casino dort konnen Sie spielen und gewinnen!

  4. kwxbmfts
  5. tyylurfp
  6. kqfgvdea
  7. vclbumtr
  8. wjpmfeql
  9. ggpnwmat
  10. fvrwxhmo
  11. jhaxjawr
  12. yfhtotci
  13. iegzjptb
  14. rarnmwfw
  15. tcomfbra
  16. icerwpgo
  17. kvkglfay
  18. jgomnvjh
  19. gydjqvsp
  20. zhesyiqr
  21. qyryqtij
  22. ujvexpwx
  23. hvsepnut
  24. blbtmlwj
  25. uuaxjlob
  26. qeuyjhok
  27. artist-bio.ru
  28. zaxabkws
  29. ozvglhsm
  30. wqubwntt
  31. sbpgmnoi
  32. zwappivl

  33. rapbytou

  34. hztywwwn

  35. aaofmlrg

  36. pqdmyfbv

  37. osoyqxsn

  38. fdsjweqw

  39. gxdluolr

  40. jfbimylo

  41. rywqmkyl

  42. oikrzgdh

  43. eqykmjfo

  44. pdsuoeqk

  45. crvauihz

  46. uvuccgqu

  47. mohdbeez

  48. nywchxjd

  49. tpvbocca

  50. dlattqyo

Add a Comment