Chick 1 says:
Confession: I’ve never seen Les Mis, not other movies, none of the stage productions, never even read the book. So the plot was a complete unknown for me. I was surprised at how much story there is and how quickly it moves along. Even at almost 3 hours, it feels like we barely are introduced to one character or idea before we’re whisked along to the next scene. (“Oh, she’s destitute already. OK.”) This doesn’t mean that there is no depth to the story; the music, acting and, filmmaking make sure you know each person well enough to care what happens to them. But despite the brisk pace, it does at times seem a bit long.
The entire cast is strong. At the center is Hugh Jackman as Valjean and he lends his sturdy shoulders to carry the story forward. Anne Hathaway completely owns the smaller but pivotal role of Fantine. The version of I Dreamed A Dream in the movie is not the heartbreaking one used in the trailer but an even better one. And most of the song is one long take. How many of those takes did she do? Thinking about it makes me exhausted. I also really liked Eddie Redmayne as Marius and Sacha Baron Cohen surprised me as Thenardier. While Russell Crowe as Javert has a fine voice, it sometimes was not big enough for the music.
The sets, backdrops, and costumes are all beautifully done but for all its gritty realism, it is sometimes obvious they were shooting on a soundstage and not outdoors. And the green screen backdrops are not the best I’ve seen either.
But of course the true stars of this tale are the music, the tragedy, and the redemption. Les Mis is a fantastic look at the nature of Law and Grace as personified by Javert and Valjean. In truth, both men deeply value justice but to Javert justice means punishment for wrongdoing and to Valjean it means the restoration of what has been stolen. Bring your tissue and enjoy a good cry and some of the most astounding music you’ll ever hear!
фрибет pari промокод
Накрутка отзывов: Этические аспекты и последствия
В современном мире онлайн-бизнеса отзывы пользователей стали важнейшим элементом в формировании репутации компании. Они влияют на решения потенциальных клиентов и, соответственно, на доходы предприятий. Неудивительно, что некоторые компании и индивидуальные предприниматели прибегают к накрутке отзывов. Однако эта практика вызывает серьезные этические вопросы и может иметь негативные последствия.
Накрутка отзывов
Что такое накрутка отзывов?
Накрутка отзывов – это процесс создания фальшивых отзывов для искусственного улучшения репутации компании или продукта. Эти отзывы могут быть положительными, чтобы повысить рейтинг, или отрицательными, чтобы понизить рейтинг конкурентов. Существуют разные способы накрутки отзывов:
Создание фальшивых аккаунтов: Люди или боты создают множество аккаунтов на платформах отзывов и оставляют положительные комментарии.
Купленные отзывы: Оплата реальным пользователям за публикацию положительных отзывов.
Манипуляция реальными отзывами: Например, удаление отрицательных отзывов или искусственное выделение положительных.
Этические последствия
Обман потребителей: Накрутка отзывов вводит потребителей в заблуждение, заставляя их полагаться на недостоверную информацию при принятии решений о покупке.
Недобросовестная конкуренция: Использование фальшивых отзывов для дискредитации конкурентов нарушает принципы честной конкуренции, подрывает доверие к рынку и может привести к правовым последствиям.
Урон репутации: Когда накрутка становится явной, это может нанести серьёзный урон репутации компании. Потребители начинают воспринимать компанию как нечестную, что значительно снижает уровень доверия и лояльности.
Правовые аспекты
Наряду с этическими, накрутка отзывов также имеет правовые последствия. Во многих странах она рассматривается как форма мошенничества, и компании, уличенные в этой практике, могут столкнуться с штрафами и даже судебными исками. Законы, регулирующие коммерческую практику, становятся всё более строгими. Платформы отзывов также активно борются с накруткой, применяя алгоритмы, способные выявлять и блокировать фальшивые отзывы, улучшая таким образом доверие к своему контенту.
Как избежать негативных последствий
Честная стратегия: Компаниям следует фокусироваться на улучшении качества своих продуктов и обслуживания клиентов. Это лучший способ заслужить искренние положительные отзывы.
Клиентская поддержка: Активная работа с реальными отзывами, даже отрицательными, способствует улучшению репутации. Ответы на замечания и жалобы демонстрируют заботу о клиентах и желание улучшаться.
Прозрачность: Создание доверительных отношений с клиентами через прозрачные практики ведения бизнеса способствует повышению лояльности и укреплению репутации без необходимости в накрутке.
В заключение, накрутка отзывов, хотя и может показаться эффективным способом быстрого повышения рейтинга, является неустойчивой и потенциально разрушительной практикой. Долгосрочный успех компании строится на честности, качестве и уважении к потребителям.
Pretty! This haas been an extremely wonderful article.
Thanks ffor supplying theese details.
Hey! Quik questuon that’s complrtely offf topic. Do you know hoow to make yyour site mobile friendly?
My weblog lpoks weird when bowsing fromm mmy iphone.
I’m trying too find a theme or plugin that might bbe able to resolve this problem.
If you habe any recommendations, please share. Witth thanks!
https://proxy-su.researchport.umd.edu/login?url=https://www.google.com.tr/url?q=https://edicionesdelau.com/articles/1win_promo_code_offer.html
The world’s largest architectural model captures New York City in the ’90s
aerodrome finance
The Empire State building stands approximately 15 inches tall, whereas the Statue of Liberty measures at just under two inches without its base. At this scale, even ants would be too big to represent people in the streets below.
These lifelike miniatures of iconic landmarks can be found on the Panorama — which, at 9,335 square feet, is the largest model of New York City, meticulously hand-built at a scale of 1:1,200. The sprawling model sits in its own room at the Queens Museum, where it was first installed in the 1960s, softly rotating between day and night lighting as visitors on glass walkways are given a bird’s eye view of all five boroughs of the city.
To mark the model’s 60th anniversary, which was celebrated last year, the museum has published a new book offering a behind-the-scenes look at how the Panorama was made. Original footage of the last major update to the model, completed in 1992, has also gone on show at the museum as part of a 12-minute video that features interviews with some of the renovators.
The Queens Museum’s assistant director of archives and collections, Lynn Maliszewski, who took CNN on a visit of the Panorama in early March, said she hopes the book and video will help to draw more visitors and attention to the copious amount of labor — over 100 full-time workers, from July 1961 to April 1964 — that went into building the model.
“Sometimes when I walk in here, I get goosebumps, because this is so representative of dreams and hopes and family and struggle and despair and excitement… every piece of the spectrum of human emotion is here (in New York) happening at the same time,” said Maliszewski. “It shows us things that you can’t get when you’re on the ground.”
Original purpose
The Panorama was originally built for the 1964 New York World’s Fair, then the largest international exhibition in the US, aimed at spotlighting the city’s innovation. The fair was overseen by Robert Moses, the influential and notorious urban planner whose highway projects displaced hundreds of thousands New Yorkers. When Moses commissioned the Panorama, which had parts that could be removed and redesigned to determine new traffic patterns and neighborhood designs, he saw an opportunity to use it as a city planning tool.
Originally built and revised with a margin of error under 1%, the model was updated multiple times before the 1990s, though it is now frozen in time. According to Maliszewski, it cost over $672,000 to make in 1964 ($6.8 million in today’s money) and nearly $2 million (about $4.5 million today) was spent when it was last revised in 1992.
A librarian ran off with a yacht captain in the summer of 1968. It was the start of an incredible love story
metamask wallet
The first time Beverly Carriveau saw Bob Parsons, she felt like a “thunderbolt” passed between them.
“This man stepped out of a taxi, and we both just stared at each other,” Beverly tells CNN Travel today. “You have to remember, this is the ‘60s. Girls didn’t stare at men. But it was a thunderbolt.”
It was June 1968. Beverly was a 23-year-old Canadian university librarian on vacation in Mazatlan, Mexico, with a good friend in tow.
Beverly had arrived in Mazatlan that morning. She’d been blown away by the Pacific Ocean views, the colorful 19th-century buildings, the palm trees.
Now, Beverly was browsing the hotel gift store, admiring a pair of earrings, when she looked up and spotted the man getting out of the taxi. The gift shop was facing the parking lot, and there he was.
“I was riveted,” says Beverly. “He was tall, handsome…”
Eventually, Beverly tore away her gaze, bought the earrings and dashed out of the store.
“We locked eyes so long, I was embarrassed,” she says.
No words had passed between them. They hadn’t even smiled at each other. But Beverly felt like she’d revealed something of herself. She felt like something had happened, but she couldn’t describe it.
Beverly rushed to meet her friend, still feeling flustered. Over dinner in the hotel restaurant, Beverly confided in her friend about the “thunderbolt” moment.
“I told my girlfriend, ‘Something just happened to me. I stared at this man, and I couldn’t help myself.’”
Then, the server approached Beverly’s table.
“He said, ‘I have some wine for you, from a man over there.’”
The waiter was holding a bottle of white wine, indicating at the bar, which was packed with people.
As a rule, Beverly avoided accepting drinks from men in bars. She never felt especially comfortable with the power dynamic — plus, she had a long-term partner back in Canada.
“I had a serious boyfriend at home and thought my life was on course,” she says.
Xavier completes thrilling comeback, Mount St. Mary’s advances as men’s First Four comes to a close
changenow exchange
Wednesday saw the men’s First Four come to a close which means only one thing: the 64-team bracket is officially set following No. 11 Xavier’s thrilling come from behind win over No. 11 Texas and No. 16 Mount St. Mary’s victory over No. 16 American in Dayton, Ohio.
The Musketeers trailed by as many as 13 points, but their offense came alive in the second half behind guard Marcus Foster and forward Zach Freemantle to down the Longhorns 86-80.
The senior Foster scored a team-high 22 points while Freemantle, on his way to 15 points, threw down a dunk with a second left to seal the comeback win and ignite the fans at UD Arena, which is just over 50 miles away from campus in Cincinnati, Ohio.
With just under four minutes remaining, Xavier went on an 8-2 run to take a 78-74 lead, their first since the early going of the first half.
Musketeers head coach Sean Miller crowned Wednesday’s game as “one of the best” he’s been a part of.
“I thought we were dead in the water two different times,” Miller told the truTV broadcast after the game. “But that’s the one thing about our team — the resiliency of our group has always won out for us. Just when you thought we weren’t gonna make the tournament, we kept winning. Even in this game, just when you’re like, ‘It’s not gonna work out,’ we have a funny way of staying with it.”
The Longhorns did not go down without a fight as guard Tre Johnson scored a game-high 23 points in the loss.
Xavier will face No. 6 Illinois in the first round on Friday at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee.